Yeah we had some intense play and some interesting flexing of the rules yesterday. Here are some high points. I’m paraphrasing in all cases:
Scene: our heroes have come to the edge of a clearing as they track their nemesis, Harrison. From cover they see Harrison and three flunkies talking to two bug monsters (bug monsters so far have been very friendly) and the bugs have weapons on Harrison et al.
Toph: I approach under a white flag offering to explain the situation.
Me: Hmm, okay, well that’s clearly SOCIALIZE…
Toph: No, I don’t want to explain the situation. I’m trying to get close enough to murder Harrison.
Me: Ah. Normally I’d call that VIOLENCE but I think here what’s really important is the deception. So MISCHIEF. And the risk is CONFUSION.
So what’s interesting here? Well, obviously the first thing is that the actual intent of the player wasn’t stated clearly at first and so there was some necessary back and forth to get at the nub of the action. This is good: there are conflicting instincts at play. On the one hand you want your text to be a good read, to be poetic, and to preserve secrets until the last moment. But also you want to be absolutely clear what method to bring to bear. So we go back and forth a little to get there.

So Toph’s character Jesus gets close enough and rams their strange artifact, the “pliant fuzz” down Harrison’s throat. The power and function of an alien artifact is mostly narrative: it’s incomprehensible, it has some properties that are absurd but well defined. The rest is in the hands of the players. So they can inexplicably serve the narrative already established by the dice with complete freedom. Here’s what’s certainly true about the pliant fuzz: its mass is much much higher than it should be and it’s dangerous. The results when successfully murdering someone with it are spectacular (and cause CONFUSION since that risk was realized): Harrison dies horribly, the fuzz explodes all over things, those with guns all open fire, grenades go off, everyone runs for cover.
Fun stuff.
The next point that was illuminating was when Dune’s character Duarte opens fire with an alien gun on Harrison’s remaining cohorts. He knows nothing about the gun and it has 3d6 — that means you get a lot of dice but they all kind of suck. There’s a lot of room for risks to get realized but also succeed.
Dune: I fire the vegetable gun at Harrison’s men! I wonder what it does?
Me: Okay that’s VIOLENCE obviously, with a risk of CONFUSION [I figure the gun is noisy and makes a lot of vapour].
Dune: [rolls dice and gets success with risk]
Now this is part of a montage and I’m juggling the actions of three different people roughly at the same time. I realize at this point that another character’s action is much better if it risks CONFUSION and that Dune’s action is obviously better risking SPILLOVER.
Me: I think SPILLOVER is better here actually. You open fire and there is a huge eruption of noise and vapour. Thousands of 15cm quills are launched into the clearing killing all of Harrison’s men and one of the two bug people.
Dune: Oh no!
I goofed. I shouldn’t change the risk after the roll since declaring the risk is an opportunity for the character to change their actions. And the players are really fond of the bug people so this result is actually quite traumatic. It’s also a really powerful and unexpected twist in the story which is exactly what the system is supposed to deliver.
So if there was an X-Card on the table I wouldn’t have been too concerned — I would expect Dune to tap it if this was unacceptable (which would have been totally reasonable either because it was too cruel or because I got the rules twisted up). But we don’t generally play with one in this particular group (there is already a very high level of trust) so I am a little on eggshells over this result. What to do?
Talk it out. I explain the problem. We talk about X-Cards. Dune assures me that he doesn’t need an X-Card in order to tell me to back the fuck up — that is, we do have an X-Card in that everyone agrees they are fine with stopping play at any time if it goes down a path they are not cool with.
Relief. I thought we had that relationship but I haven’t clarified it. Clarifying it takes a load off me: we actually do play with the X-Card just not literally and I didn’t know for sure we did. Now I do. And I also know now that if I ever run a con game or otherwise set up for people I don’t know, I will use the X-Card at least because it starts that conversation before it’s necessary.
You can get Sand Dogs when it’s ready. It’s one of a series of games set in the multiverse of the Soft Horizon, and you can get the first one, The King Machine, now.
Luke over at the VSCA Discord brings up an interesting point: the problem I had with switching up risks is really common. It’s going to happen. Since the rule is solid (set the risk before the roll) but it will get missed or rolled over occasionally, rather than more rules it seems like you should have some recovery techniques. Mine is basically Brie Beau Sheldon’s script change, though informally: if the player has a problem with something, especially if I blew a rule as ref, then we can always go back and re-do it. Unloading the taboo against rewinding is really important. Just offering a rewind can make that sense of unfairness go away.
LikeLike
Just want to say: I’m very much looking forward to playing this game. Hope to organize a playtest soon. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please report back! Or if you get a King Machine session happening (same system after all).
LikeLike
Duarte doesn’t know what the alien gun will do, but it sounds like a very powerful alien/god tier artifact, so maybe Dune shouldn’t know either — to give it an air of extra dangerous unpredictability. In this case not knowing the risk before the roll could be justified. Or expand the possible risks — by picking a handful, or by denying one and leaving the rest on the table.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, it’s always easy to justify things like that if you try hard enough, but the fact is I broke the rule and the rule’s there for a reason. And the fact that the artifact has 3d6 is plenty of clue that it’s going to be some kind of problem. 😀
LikeLike